Post Mutants and Masterminds Hero's Handbook Errata Here

[UnkindMirror]

Page 123, Regeneration Cost: 1 Point per rank

Flaws Source: -1 Cost per rank

And the error would be?

If you're thinking that Regeneration with the Source Flaw would cost zero points per rank, you should read the section "Fractional Costs" in the Modifiers chapter.

[Darzoni]

Printed version, pg 155, Sidebar: Creative Use of Descriptors. This is the only place I've seen power stunts mentioned at all. Is this intentional?

[Monolith]

Printed version, pg 155, Sidebar: Creative Use of Descriptors. This is the only place I've seen power stunts mentioned at all. Is this intentional?

Power stunts are covered under extra effort on page 20.

[Tailorpress]

Hey guys,
The advantage Diehard states that you get to ignore the stamina role needed to stabilize the dying condition. The dying condition states that you must make a Fortitude check to stabilize...which is it?

[Kariggi]

Moved to DCA errata sorry

[Lime2K]

On the Gadgeteer archetype (pg 39), Agility should be 2, not 1.

[naturax]

Mutants and Masterminds Hero's Handbook PDF, page 146:

Check Required

"If the check succeeds, the character gains the use of 1 effect rank per point the check exceeds the DC. Thus a check result of 14 allows the character to use up to 4 ranks of the effect."

Should say:

"With one rank in Check Required, the DC of the check is 11. If the check succeeds, the character gains the use of 1 effect rank per point the check exceeds the DC. Thus, a check result of 14 allows the character to use up to 3 ranks of the effect."

Or something like that. The example listed doesn't make sense, because it would imply the original DC was 10, which would mean zero ranks of the flaw.

[thefatguy]

pg.126 UNDER THE HOOD: NORMAL SENSES

Under TACTILE, the description for the normal sense of touch should include the fact that it is also acute with some appropriately colorful language in parenthesis.

e.g. … acute (in that you can discern texture, temperature and the like) …

[ciryon]

Hello all

Is a PDF version of M&M hero handbook errata will be out soon ?

Thanks and regards

Ciryon

[monele]

I have a print edition which seems to include most of the errata here, but not all. Is this thread (or just its first post) considered official errata? Is the SRD updated with errata? Is there another source for official and definitive errata?

[ecar369]

Pg. 114 Insubstantial Extras: for 'Affects Others' is lists the cost as +0 or +1 cost per rank. I'm assuming it's actually just +1 per rank, and this was intended for the 'Attack' extra below (which does already have the same cost listed).

[JonL]

Pg. 114 Insubstantial Extras: for 'Affects Others' is lists the cost as +0 or +1 cost per rank. I'm assuming it's actually just +1 per rank, and this was intended for the 'Attack' extra below (which does already have the same cost listed).

Sorry, I just noticed this message.

The +0 or +1 is their because it's the same as the Affects Others modifier found on page 136. It's +0 if the power affects only others and not you, and +1 if you give others the ability to use the power (by touch) and can withdraw the power.

[WanderingMystic]

The power points total for Elemental in the character creator seem to be off
It says 86 points are spent in powers but form what I can see Earth is only 82 points (Rock specifically is only 81) not 86 points, Water Controller is 82 points, and Ice Controller is 82 points.

[The Stray]

Mutants and Masterminds Hero's Handbook PDF, page 146:

Check Required

"If the check succeeds, the character gains the use of 1 effect rank per point the check exceeds the DC. Thus a check result of 14 allows the character to use up to 4 ranks of the effect."

Should say:

"With one rank in Check Required, the DC of the check is 11. If the check succeeds, the character gains the use of 1 effect rank per point the check exceeds the DC. Thus, a check result of 14 allows the character to use up to 3 ranks of the effect."

Or something like that. The example listed doesn't make sense, because it would imply the original DC was 10, which would mean zero ranks of the flaw.

Actually, because rolling an 11 would count as a success, a check result of 14 would, in fact, get you 4 ranks of the power.

DC 11 -- 1 rank of the power
DC 12 -- 2 ranks
DC 13 -- 3 ranks
DC 14 -- 4 ranks
...and so on.

But I agree that mentioning that "With one rank in Check Required, the DC of the check is 11." would be a welcome addition.

[naturax]

Mutants and Masterminds Hero's Handbook PDF, page 146:

Check Required

"If the check succeeds, the character gains the use of 1 effect rank per point the check exceeds the DC. Thus a check result of 14 allows the character to use up to 4 ranks of the effect."

Should say:

"With one rank in Check Required, the DC of the check is 11. If the check succeeds, the character gains the use of 1 effect rank per point the check exceeds the DC. Thus, a check result of 14 allows the character to use up to 3 ranks of the effect."

Or something like that. The example listed doesn't make sense, because it would imply the original DC was 10, which would mean zero ranks of the flaw.

Actually, because rolling an 11 would count as a success, a check result of 14 would, in fact, get you 4 ranks of the power.

DC 11 -- 1 rank of the power
DC 12 -- 2 ranks
DC 13 -- 3 ranks
DC 14 -- 4 ranks
...and so on.

But I agree that mentioning that "With one rank in Check Required, the DC of the check is 11." would be a welcome addition.

That makes WAY more sense. I don't know what I was thinking.